• Lecture
  • Related Materials

Sr. Roberto Fernando Claros Abarca

Sr. Roberto Fernando Claros Abarca
Profesor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

Biography Biography in PDF

International Economic Law
Foreign Investment
La subjetividad internacional del inversionista: a propósito de la demanda reconvencional en arbitrajes inversionista-Estado
Video | Audio
(1/10/2018, 31 minutes)
International Economic Law
Foreign Investment
La subjetividad internacional del inversionista: a propósito de la demanda reconvencional en arbitrajes inversionista-Estado
A. Instrumentos Legales

Convenio sobre Arreglo de Diferencias Relativas a Inversiones entre Estados y Nacionales de Otros Estados, Washington, 18 de marzo de 1965, Naciones Unidas, Serie de Tratados, vol. 575, p. 159.

Convención para el establecimiento de una Corte Centroamericana de Justicia, 20 de diciembre de 1907, (1908) 2 AJIL Supp. 231.

Declaración del Gobierno de la República Democrática y Popular de Argelia, Algers, 19 de enero de 1981.

B. Jurisprudencia

Corte Permanente de Justicia International, The Case of the S.S. Lotus (France v. Turkey), Sentencia de 7 de septiembre de 1927, P.C.I.J., Series A, No. 10, p. 5.

Corte Permanente de Justicia International, Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, Opinion Consultiva de 3 de marzo de 1928, P.C.I.J., Series B, No. 15, p. 34.

Corte International de Justicia, Reparation for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations, Opinion Consultiva, I.C.J. Reports 1949, p. 174.

Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company/California Asiatic Oil Company v Government of the Libyan Arab Republic, Laudo Preliminar de 27 de noviembre de 1975.

Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company/California Asiatic Oil Company v Government of the Libyan Arab Republic, Laudo de 19 de enero de 1977.

Urbaser S.A. y Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa c. República Argentina, Laudo de 8 de diciembre de 2016, Caso CIADI No. ARB/07/26.

C. Documentos
D. Doctrina

P. Abel, “Counterclaims based on International Human Rights Obligations of Investors in International Investment Arbitration: Fallacies and Potentials of the 2016 ICSID Urbaser v. Argentina Award”, Brill Open Law, julio de 2018, pp. 1-30.

J. E. Alvarez, “Are Corporations ‘Subjects’ of International Law?”, Santa Clara Journal of International Law, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-36.

J. A. Barberis, Los Sujetos del Derecho Internacional Actual, Tecnos, Madrid, 1984.

A.K. Bjorklund, “The Role of Counterclaims in Rebalancing Investment Law”, Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2013, pp. 461-480.

R.T. Braun, “Globalization: The Driving Force in International Investment Law”, en M. Waibel, et. al (eds), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, Kluwer Law International, Alphen ann den Rijn, 2010.

I. Brownlie, Principles of Public International, 7th ed, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 2008.

J. Crawford, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, octava edición, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.

A. Cassese, International Law, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 2005.

A. Clapham, “Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors”, The Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 2006.

Z. Douglas, “The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration”, The British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 74, No. 1, 2003, pp. 151-289.

J. Dunnof, S. R. Ratner y D. Wippman, International Law Norms, Actors, Process: A Problem Oriented Approach, 3th ed, Aspen Publishers, Nueva York, 2010.

M. Friedman, y I. Popova, “Can State Counterclaims Salvage Investment Arbitration?”, World Arbitration & Mediation Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2014, pp. 139-149.

R. Higgins, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use it, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 1994.

R. Higgins, “Conceptual Thinking about the Individual in International Law”, British Journal of International Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1 (Abril, 1978), pp. 1-19.

N. Jägers, Corporate Human Rights Obligations: In Search of Accountability, Intersentia, 2002.

H. Kelsen, Principios de Derecho Internacional, Editorial El Ateneo, Buenos Aires, 1965.

H. E. Kjos, “Counterclaims by Host States in Investment Treaty Arbitration”, Transnational Dispute Management, New Aspects of International Investment Law, Research Seminar, Hague Academy of International Law, N° 4, 2007.

R. McCorquodale, “The Individual and the International Legal System”, en M. Evans (ed), International Law, 4th ed, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 2014.

C. Schreuer, et. al. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, Nueva York, 2009.

J. Paulsson, “Arbitration Without Privity”, ICSID Review of Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1995, pp. 232-257.

I. C. Popova y F. Poon, “From Perpetual Respondent to Aspiring Counterclaimant? State Counterclaims in the New Wave of Investment Treaties”, BCDR International Arbitration Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2015, pp. 223–260.

R. Portmann, Legal Personality in International Law, Cambridge University Presss, Nueva York, 2010.

J.A. Rivas, “ICSID Treaty Counterclaims: Case Law and Treaty Evolution”, Transnational Dispute Management, No. 1, 2014.

W. Wengler, “La noción de sujeto de derecho internacional público examinada bajo el aspecto de algunos fenómenos políticos actuales”, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, Vol. IV-VI, N° 3, 1953.

K. M. Yunusov, V. Ok y H. Ochildiyev, “The Roles and Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations with regard to Human Rights”, Cuadernos Constitucionales de la Cátedra Fadrique Furió Ceriol, 2008, Número 64-65, págs. 187-204.