Codification Division Publications: Reports of International Arbitral Awards Codification Division Publications: Reports of International Arbitral Awards

Last update: June 8, 2016

Volume XVII

Table of Contents PDF
Foreword View PDF file
Avant-propos
Case concerning the Indo-Pakistan Western boundary (Rann of Kutch) between India and Pakistan Tribunal constituted pursuant to Agreement of 30 June 1965 View PDF file
Introductory Note 3
Award 5
Chapter I: Introduction 7
  1.     Constitution of the Tribunal Proceedings 7
  2.     The Question of ex aequo et bono 11
  3.     Submissions 11
  4.     Pillars on the Claimed Boundary Lines 14
  5.     The Main Arguments and Evidence of the Parties 15
  6.     Relevant Dates 18
  7.     Applicable Law Equity 19
Chapter II: The nature of the Rann, and the “Median Line” Concept 22
  1.     The Nature of the Rann 22
  2.     The “Median Line” Concept 25
Chapter III: Historical Background           31
  1.     Kutch and Sind until the Advent of the British 31
    (a)   Kutch 31
    (b)  Sind 34
  2      The Advent of the British 39
  3.     The Shape of British Rule in India 51
  4.     The End of British Rule in India 59
Chapter IV: Boundaries within India under British Rule 64
Chapter V: Surveys and maps 83
  1.     Maps as Evidence 83
  2.     The Authority of the Survey of India 88
  3.     The Distribution of Maps 96
  4.     Pre-Survey Maps 98
  5.     The Survey of Sind in 1855–70 (Macdonald) 105
  6.     The Survey of Kutch in 1879–86 (Pullan) 116
  7.     The Survey of Parts of Sind in 1904–05 (Erskine) 122
  8.     The Survey of Parts of Sind in 1937–38 (Osmaston) 131
    The Eastern-Most Triangle 143
  9.      Atlas and Degree Sheets and Maps of Western India States Agency 147
  10.     The 32-Mile Map of India 155
Mr. Bebler’s presentation of Sections 4 to 10 of Chapter V: Surveys and Maps 166
  4A.  Pre-Survey Maps 166
  5A.  The Survey of Sind in 1855–70 (Macdonald) 171
  6A.  The Survey of Kutch in 1879–86 (Pullan) 185
  7A.  The Survey of Parts of Sind in 1904–05 (Erskine) 192
  8A.  The Survey of Parts of Sind and Parts of the States of Western India in 1937–38 (Osmaston) 198
  9A.  The Indian Atlas Series 202
  10A.  The 32-Mile Map of India 207
Chapter VI: The Issue of Rights in Parts of Rann 218
  1.     The Enquiry of Miles (1823) 218
  2.     The Keswala Bet Decision (1860) 220
  3.     The Poong Bet Decision (1867) 222
  4.     The Nara Bet Decision (1897) 225
  5.     The Kennedy “Valuation Judgment” (1898) 230
  6.     The Nara Bet after 1897 and the North-Eastern Rann 235
  7.     Maps Which Show Boundaries in the Rann 242
  8.     Other References to Possessions of Indian States in the Rann 243
  9.     Summary and General Argument 245
Chapter VII: Certain Non-Cartographical Evidence 252
  1.     Introduction 252
  2.     The Rann as an Entity Separating Sind and Kutch 252
  3.     The Rann as an Entity Bounding Kutch 258
  4.     The Rann as an Entity Bounding Sind 261
  5.     The 24th Degree of North Latitude as the Limit of Kutch 263
    (a)    Kutch Administration Reports 263
    (b)   Bombay Administration Reports 263
    (c)   Gazetteers 265
    (d)   Other Documents 266
  6.     The 24th Degree of North Latitude as the Limit of Sind 267
  7.     The Entire Rann Belonged to Kutch 268
    (a)   Statistical Abstracts 268
    (b)   Kutch Administration Reports 271
    (c)   Bombay Administration Reports 279
    (d)   Gazetteers 284
    (e)   Aitchison’s Treaties 292
    (f)    Some Published Works 293
    (g)   Memoranda on Native States in India 296
    (h)   Brief Notes etc., on Kutch 296
    (i)    Miscellaneous References 298
  8.     The Northern Edge of the Rann as the Limit of Sind 303
  9.     Sind and Kutch Conterminous along the Northern Edge of the Rann 308
  10.   Sind and Kutch Conterminous in the Western Sector 312
  11.   A:    The Boundary of Kutch as Passing Through Particular Places 315
    B:    The Boundary of Sind as Passing Through Particular Places 315
  12.   Miscellaneous 317
  13.   The Rann as “No Man’s Land” 321
Chapter VIII: The Sind-Kutch Boundary as an Issue in British Times 324
  1.     The 1876 Resolution 324
  2.     The 1885 Resolutions 330
  3.     The 1914 Resolution and the Erection of Pillars in 1924 336
    (a)   The Resolution 336
    (b)   The Erection of the Pillars 346
  4.     The Creation of Sind as a Governor’s Province in 1935 350
Chapter IX: Acts of “Jurisdiction” in the Northern Half of the Rann 358
  1.     The Main Submissions of the Parties 358
  2.     Settlements of Sind Purportedly Situated Outside the Boundary Claimed by India 360
  3.     Construction, Maintenance and Marking of Roads in the Rann, and Construction of Dharamsalas on Bets Therein 363
  4.     Fishing Licences 367
  5.     Projects for Canals and Irrigation Systems 367
  6.     Salt 374
  7.     Military Districts and Military Control 375
  8.     Patrolling Under the Cease-Fire Agreement of 1965 376
  9.     Survey Operations 376
  10.   Police Surveillance and Police Jurisdiction (General) 378
  11.   Offences Inquired into by Sind Police 380
  12.   Criminal Cases Tried in Courts of Sind and Pakistan 381
    (a)   Pre-Partition Incidents 381
    (b)   Post-Independence Incidents 383
  13.   Criminal Cases Tried in Indian Courts 383
  14.   Customs 384
  15.   Dhara Banni and Chhad Bet. Pirol Valo Kun 386
  16.   Karim Shahi Bet 407
  17.   General Argument 410
Mr. Bebler’s Presentation of the Matters Dealt with in Chapter IX, Section 15: Dhara Banni and Chhad Bet. Pirol Valo Kun 418
CONCLUSIONS
Dissenting Opinion of Judge Aleš Bebler 431
  The Terms of Reference of the Tribunal 431
  The Nature and the Geographic Position of the Rann 434
  Some Lessons of Distant History 434
  The Suzerain and its Vassals 435
  A Treaty and a Proclamation 440
  Cession of British Territory 443
  The Origin of Boundaries 446
  Acquiescence in and Recognition of Boundaries 449
  The Significance of Authoritative Statements 454
    1.     The Bilateral Agreement of 1914 456
    2.     The Kutch Administration Reports 457
    3.     Official Documents of the Political Agent, Kutch 457
    4.     Official Documents of the Government of Bombay 457
    5.     Official Documents and Publications of the Government of India 458
    6.     Official Records of the Secretary of State 458
    7.     Official Publications of the Western India States Agency 458
    8.     Official Publications of Sind 458
    9.     Maps 459
    10.   The Definition of the Boundaries of Sind in 1935 460
  The Process of Crystallisation and Consolidation 461
    1802–1843 462
    1843–1855 464
    1855–1870 465
    1870–1914 468
    1914 474
    1914–1947 477
  Display of State Authority 481
  Evidence on Display of State Authority 488
    I.      Evidence Submitted by Pakistan 488
    II.      Evidence Submitted by India 494
  Summary and Findings 495
Proposal of Mr. Nasrollah Entezam (submitted on 17 November 1967) 502
  Introduction 502
  A Note on Some Aspects of the Case 503
    I.      Claims of the Parties 503
    II.      Nature of the Rann 503
    III.     The Relevant Date and the Critical Date 504
    IV.    Extent of the Rann on the Critical Date 504
    V.    Claim of Kutch to the Rann in 1819 504
    VI.    Comments on Certain Categories of Evidence 504
      (1)   Gazetteers 504
      (2)   Maps 504
      (3)   Index Map of 1935 505
      (4)   Kutch Administration Reports 506
      (5)   Bombay Administration Reports 506
      (6)   Statistical Abstracts 506
      (7)   The 1914 Dispute 507
    VII.   Estoppel 507
    VIII.  Upper Lands and Lands of the Lower Delta 507
    IX.    Pakistan Maps 1 and 4 507
    X.     Evidence of Inhabitants of the Region, and Persons who explored the Rann 508
    XI.    Grazing 508
    XII.   Precedents Supporting Pakistan’s Claim 508
    XIII.   Exercise of Jurisdiction 508
    XIV. Chhad Bet 509
    XV.  Vertical Line 510
    XVI. Karim Shahi 510
    XVII. The Maharao’s Admissions 510
    XVIII.Locally Recognised Boundary 511
    XIX.  No Man’s Land 511
    XX.  Was the Boundary in the Rann Between Sind and Kutch Ever Settled (i.e., is the Dispute Pending)? 511
  Proposal 512
Opinion of the Chairman 527
Opinion of Mr. Entezam 571
Decision 572
Annex I 573
  Agreement on the Rules of Procedure for the Demarcation of the Boundary to be Determined by the Tribunal 575
Index View PDF file
Complete PDF View PDF file